
The Cruel Radiance: Photography and Political Violence by Susie Linfield
“Every image of barbarism…embraces its opposite. Every image of suffering says not only, ‘This is so,’ but also, by implication: ‘This must not be’; not only, ‘This goes on,’ but also, by implication: ‘This must stop.’ Documents of suffering are documents of protest: they show us what happens when we unmake the world.”
“…what photographers can do, and do peculiarly well, is to show how those without such rights look, and what the absence of such rights does to a person.”
“Photographs show how easily we are reduced to the merely physical, which is to say how easily the body can be maimed, starved, splintered, beaten, burnt, torn, and crushed. Photographs present us, in short, with physical cruelty and our vulnerability to it. The vulnerability is something that every human shares; the cruelty is something that shatters our very sense of what it means to be human.”
“They want the worst things on earth — the most agonizing, unjust things on earth — to be represented in ways that are not incomplete, imperfect, or discomfiting…Ultimately, pious denouncements of the ‘pornographic’ photograph reveal something that is, I think, fairly simple: a desire to not look at the world’s cruelest moments and to remain, therefore, unsullied.”
“Because photographs of children can so easily weaken the viewer’s capacity to form considered judgments, they are the perfect vehicle for nurturing simple-minded solutions and thoughtless vengeance rather than political wisdom.”
“The Abu Ghraib images shocked the public, and scared the government, precisely because they were photographs; they could not be spun, denied, or explained away, and though they could be interpreted in various ways, they could not be made to mean anything at all.”
“…the viewer often abandons herself to the action in front of her and must struggle, after the fact, to reassert her autonomy and reconnect to what she knows. She must undo the process of dissolving; she must reassert her separateness and her ‘heightened presence of mind.’”
“‘Our apology for publishing such material,’ RAWA [Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan] courteously notes on the site. ‘This is the reality of life for the people of Afghanistan.’”
“This book argues again and again that we need to look at the violence of the world we inhabit; but there is a limit to the visual cruelty that I want to let in. I do not want to watch Daniel Pearl, or piteous others, as their heads are sliced away from their bodies; I do not want to watch Iraqis or Afghans or Israelis as the sucide bombers transform them from whole human beings into fragments of flesh. This is not a matter of complex morality or political principle but one of simple breakage. Here is the point at which I find myself saying not just ‘enough,’ but: ‘Too much.’”
“Capa was, quite simply, extraordinarily alert to the world.”
“…it is hard to sympathize with the resentful cries of these too-tender critics, who seem offended not by the obscene things people do to each other but by pictorial representations of those things.”
“…Marinovich writes: ‘I knew that of all the gory and heart-wrenching scenes I had already photographed that morning, this dead baby was the image that would show the insane cruelty of the attack…But the light sucked.’”
“Peress himself acknowledged this change. ‘I work much more…like a police photographer,’ he observed in 1997. ‘The work is much more factual…I don’t care that much anymore about “good photography.” I’m gathering evidence for history.’”